Sanskrit: A Bharatiya origin

A Bharatiya origin

Sanskrit is the most ancient language on this planet and is regarded as the mother of all languages.

Lately, I have been noticing some news and blogs which claim that Sanskrit traveled from Europe to Bharat. I am astonished by the people who are peddling such fake propaganda that was created in the 18th century to boost European supremacy. It is not morally correct to appropriate and manipulate the history and civilization of other cultures. the aim was to somehow project the Aryan invasion true and Europeans (mainly Germanic).

It appears that there is a forceful attempt to fit everything in 6000 years. For example, people consider Harappa as a legit historical place but Kurukshetra as fake. Even when there are plenty of pieces of evidence to prove Kurukshetra, several theorist create confusion deliberately to reject the existence of it because it does not fit the timeline.

Humans are considered the most intelligent creature on this planet and language holds the most important place as a means of communication. The knowledge in ancient times was written either in Sanskrit or Tamil. Both originated in the Indian subcontinent around the same time. This language was collaboratively created by the Sapta Rishis or the seven sages. Here is an important thing to note that there is no specific founder of Sanskrit. The Vedas were written originally in Sanskrit after the Sapta Rishis received knowledge from Mahayogi (Shiva). In Samadhi, the sages began learning secrets of the universe in the form of Vibrations, sounds and frequencies. Vedas were written down for the generation to come around 15,000-20,000 back.

It is important to mentions here that Vedas recorded things about River Saraswati. According to Nilesh Oak, an archeo-astronomer mentions that the carbon dating of the Saraswati river shows that it had existed more than 15,000 years ago and ended 4500 years back. Multiple archeo-astronomers reject the timelines given by the westerners. The question arises is: when there are no proper dates given but plenty of astronomical data, how were the westerners proved the timelines that have been proposed? Because there was no proof to present other than papers and think tanks. This is one of the evidence why Sanskrit is older than stated. Dwarika, which existed around 8,000 back, recorded historical documents both in Vedic Sanskrit and Classical Sanskrit.

Panini's contribution to the recording of Sanskrit is categorized as classical Sanskrit and not purely Vedic Sanskrit. The finest grammar that is ever produced is called "Ashtadhyay". The script is written in Devnagri with 64 letters in Vedic and 52 letters in classical Sanskrit. It has the capability of creating 'n' number of words without conflicting the other. Sanskrit is also used in chanting to date. But you will never find a single evidence of the traveling of Sanskrit from Germany or other regions of Europe to India. The only connection is Latin or greek which is derived from Sanskrit. But still, no evidence of Sanskrit to be present as the native language.

Why protecting Sanskrit?

Sanskrit was designed in a specific way. Although, it is similar to any other language in its beginning design still the special aspect of this language is that it has taken vibrations and sounds into consideration.

In the colonial times (since the 12th century) Sanskrit was first to be attacked and attempted to be replaced. Amazingly, the English language has several French and Spanish words that can not be translated. There is no reason why we ought to translate Sanskrit words into other languages. It is important to keep Sanskrit words and their explanation original so we do not relinquish from the original meanings and terms.

For instance, we often talk about Atman. Interestingly, atman can not be translated into as English as a soul because the soul is separate for all beings and requires another angel to combine them all. The soul does not have properties of moksha and karma. On the contrary, Atman is one for everyone that is an outcome of Ishwara's energy. Dhyan can not be translated as meditation and Tapasya can not be called penance. Because these two words are entirely different in meanings. Shakti is not just energy but also consciousness and metaphysical force. It is a requirement to stop adulteration.

Since the 1800s, European universities started learning Sanskrit for the fact that no European language had advanced or proper grammar. It was after the 1800s when theories of Aryan invasion, Sanskrit form Europe, and so on were established to present supremacy. Fewer people know that Panini holds such great importance in Google that the translation of languages goes through the Paninian engine. For Artificial intelligence, scientists have chosen Sanskrit as the language of AI in the future. Yet India has not been credited anything. Post-independence, people started making theories to create a false narrative over the origin of Sanskrit. It is not a dead language. It just has been digested by foreigners. It is a requirement for our country people to keep it alive.

---